← Xoolink

Splitting a pack's revenue

Xoolink never holds your money. The client pays the offer lead — their single point of contact — who then pays the partners. Xoolink moves no money: the platform makes the split explicit, freezes it at signature, and tracks its execution. It is a record of agreement, not a payment account.

How the split is set

Every member who takes a position in a pack declares the amount of their contribution; the sum forms the aggregated quote sent to the requester. Once every member has signed the pact, those amounts are frozen and become the agreed split. What gets signed therefore covers “who gets what”, not only “who does what”.

Changing an amount after signature does not change the frozen split. It has to be signed again — the same rule as the pact itself.

Payments in and payments out

The lead declares what they received from the client, then declares each payment to a partner. A payment can never exceed what is still owed on the frozen share: the server caps it, and refuses a beneficiary who is absent from the split.

Confirmation belongs to the recipient

A declared payment proves nothing on its own. It is the partner who confirms having been paid, and only them: an active member of the receiving organization, or the person concerned. Whoever declares the payment cannot confirm it, even if they belong to both sides. That second side is what turns a claim into proof — the same principle as a won contract confirmed by the buyer.

Who sees what

Split amounts are commercially sensitive. They are visible only to pack members and never leave: not in the directory, not in the public API, not in webhooks.

What is public, on the lead organization's page, is a rate and a count — never a sum:

Pays its partners — 100% confirmed · 4 partners

Payer reputation

The lead organization's proof graph gains a “Pays its partners” dimension, confirmed by the recipients themselves. It ranks alongside an honoured pact or a result validated by a client.

Conversely, a lead who leaves partners unpaid beyond thirty days is demoted in the composition engine's ranking. Never excluded: they simply come after the others at equal qualification. It is the deterrent effect of an escrow, without Xoolink having to hold the funds.

What if an escrow is genuinely required?

For a mandate where the client requires a trust arrangement, use a lawyer's or notary's trust account — the usual regulated practice in Quebec. Mention it in the pact; Xoolink keeps recording the split.

Going further

The subcontracting agreement between the lead and each partner builds on this split and makes it enforceable, without Xoolink being party to the contract. The pact can be sealed with an electronic signature, and the execution space keeps milestones and documents in one place.